- As expected, contraction did not rear its ugly head.
- There was no major revamp of the amateur draft to include certain foreign players.
- A reduced form of free agent loss compensation remains in place. Type A free agents will now be the top 20% of their position (down from top 30%), and Type B will be 21-40% of their position (down from 31-50%). Type C free agents no longer mandate compensation. Upshot: The A's will get something out of losing Barry Zito.
- The luxury tax levels stay the same, but the tax threshold has increased to $148 million next year with 4.7% annual increases throughout the life of the CBA. Unless the Red Sox or Mets really went crazy, the only team that would consistently hit the threshold would be the Yankees.
- Citing the increase of non-local revenue leaguewide, the revenue sharing formula has changed, with each team set to contribute 31% (down from 34%) of their net local revenues minus "actual stadium expenses" (i.e. rent or debt service).
- League minimum salary increases from $327,000 to $380,000, with $10,000 increases thereafter.
- Drug policy remains the same and now officially runs concurrent with the CBA. Selig will cite his "blood test study" until he retires.
- The questionable rule that gives World Series home field advantage to the league that wins the All Star Game remains intact.
24 October 2006
New CBA equals minor changes
Details were announced on the new five-year deal struck between MLB and MLBPA. Some important points:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
9 comments:
Incredible. Apparently the MLBPA and the owners finally realized that they are both incredibly rich and realized how foolish it is to mess around with the golden goose. Labor peace in MLB, who woulda thunk it? In a way it's too bad. There is a lot of irony in millionairs forming a union to fight with billionairs.
Why is it amazing? It's the Major League Baseball Players Association, not the Professional Baseball Players Association. Bargaining for benefits on behalf of minor leaguers will only cause MLB to propose decreasing the share that currently goes to major league players. If circumstances were more contentious, MLB wouldn't approve of a minor league union since minor league players provide leverage against major leaguers during a work stoppage.
The players union is not akin to a working class labor union. MLBPA's goal is to increase the share of benefits they get collectively, then let the market figure out the rest. That's why there's no bonus slotting for first round picks, and why the highest paid player gets 80 times what the lowest player gets. It's a superficial solidarity at best.
You bring up a good point concerning the top earners in the MLBPA ML. How is it possible for the select "few" at the top of the earning scale to completely dominate the entire union? I would have thought that the lower tier players would have figured out long ago that the richest amoungst them do not always have their best interests at heart. It seems to me that that they should have advocated a higher "floor" salary for the lesser players. Why do the majority of these guys vote against their own self interest?
I know why Fehr and his crew do what they do. Their skids are greased by the high earners, so that is who they are going to cater to and represent. The other guys....not so much.
why is it that jrbh gets away with the politics crap while others get a slap on the wrist for less
If jrbh's political rants caused the same kinds of flame wars the city debate did, I'd do the same kind of moderation. Thankfully it doesn't.
I dunno, off topic is off topic any way you cut it. And talking about the best place for the A's to be and what to call them when it happens is more on topic than comparing Lou Wolf to Reagan, who is dead.
But thats just what I think. Whatever floats your boat, Marine Layer.
Sorry, I don't get paid enough to play babysitter (notice how the blog is completely ad-free). If you're going to post a comment, you're leaving yourself open to criticism. I'll step in for anything I deem egregious. That's as far as it goes.
Why is it that everyone jrbh has a problem with is a stalker? Its getting lame.
I agree that ML has better things to do than babysit. However, there are also other blogs we can go to if this keeps up.
As long as people support baseball by purchasing tickets there's not going to be much change in the MLBPA's tactics.
For the record jrbh,
That last jeff is not the same as the 1st two in this thread. I try to avoid personal arguments over the internet. To me, it's like running in the special olympics, even if you win you're still retarded.
Post a Comment