According to Johnson, the $70 million figure is based on "rough paper estimates" on how much it would cost to build a new station. A complete study would have to be undertaken for BART to be able to obtain firmer figures and a breakdown of costs. More interesting facts:
- The cost would depend largely on whether the station is on-line (used during all operating hours) or off-line (used during games only). So far, no stations on the current system operate on an off-line basis, but it was considered for some of the stations between Colma and SFO.
- The 10 car estimate is based only on operating a station on an off-line basis. An unknown higher number of cars would be needed if the station were to operate on-line/full time. The final number of cars needed would depend on a final study.
- The A's have not called BART yet to ask them to explore this further.
- The process of getting a BART station approved and built involves some of the typical studies such as an environmental impact report (EIR) and a California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) process.
- About prioritizing such a project, Johnson said, "Money and politics will determine priority."
In other news, columnist Evan Weiner of the Bergen Record/NorthJersey.com details the trend of ballpark village developments occurring in MLB cities.
1 comments:
I still don't get the need for more cars when adding a mid-line station. Why do they need more cars to make one more stop on one line? Just run the same number of cars as you do now, but make one additional stop. Sounds like BART being opportunistic (ie: taking advantage of this situation to make some capital improvements).
Post a Comment