Posters on Athletics Nation are reporting that the View level (euphemism for upper deck) will not be sold next season. I've confirmed that as of now, this only affects season ticket sales. There is no set policy with regard to regular single-game tickets, but if the A's choose not to sell the View level at all, there are serious ramifications:
- The upper deck held around 12,000. That should knock capacity down to 34-35,000
- No more View level promotions like "BART Double Play Wednesdays" or "Pepsi can weeknights"
- No need to staff the upper-upper concourse behind sections 310-325.
- Far fewer walkup seats for every date
There is the risk of backlash. Fans may not respond well to the disappearance of cheap walkup seats in the View level. The walkup situation has become something of an institution, and if A's marketing doesn't properly inform fans of this change, they may find fans either confused by the new ticket offerings or even turned away for certain games. The task for the A's is to handle this with as much diplomacy as possible. There are plenty of fans that think the seats in sections 315-320 are perfectly fine (including me). How do the A's convince them that those seats aren't good?
The upshot of all of this is to find out if the season ticket base can expand. If it does, the A's will have a good subscription base from which they can start marketing a new ballpark. If not, it becomes a reason to leave Oakland, since the lack of season ticket sales will "prove" that Oakland is not a ripe market. It's not fair to Oakland, since the Coliseum is not the same as a new ballpark, but Wolff needs some data upon which he can create a business case for a new ballpark, and that makes us guinea pigs.
3 comments:
How many bleacher seats are there? That's where I'd knock out seating first because it would not look as visually jarring as an entire upper deck empty. They could then place a big curtain over that area to hide the TV views. The bleacher bums could then relocate to the third deck and pay a little more.
Aren't there a couple of stadiums with no bleacher seating anyway? (Royals Stadium comes to mind)
Here's another thought for a new stadium: Use only temporary bleachers that can be kept stored away except for really big games that are sold out well in advance. Or perhaps also bring them out on "dollar night" promotions as a public service. However, when those seats aren't on sale, they're not there for the TV cameras to see and sportscasters to make comments about.
Lew Wolff is obviously desperate for whatever data(and extra revenue ?) this will provide. I would also guess that this has Bud Selig's blessing as well. But the initial reaction from media and fans will not be good for the A's
It wouldn't surprise me to see the A's back off of this.
Thanks for the address, jrbh... I'm going to write Wolff and let him know he has my support 100% to do this, and to ignore the reactionaries who think it's still 1989.
With your propensity towards name-calling and shoddy reasoning, I'm assuming that's an invitation?
Post a Comment